Science's Ethical Limits: Why Experts Can't Decide Values
When science overreaches: Conservation needs ethics
/file/dailymaverick/wp-content/uploads/Opinion-Cruise-WildlifeTW-1.jpg)
Scientists have a vital role to play. But they cannot arbitrate values, nor legitimise them by implication. When they attempt to do so, they risk overstepping their authority and end up narrowing, rather than enriching, the debate.
Scientists play a crucial role in conservation, but they cannot determine societal values or legitimize them through their expertise alone. When researchers overstep into value arbitration, they risk undermining public debate rather than enhancing it. The article emphasizes the need for clearer boundaries between scientific evidence and ethical decision-making.
Original Article
Read full article on Daily MaverickExplore More
Related News

Monmouth College Enhances Computer Science Program
River Cities’ Reader · 2026.04.14

The 9 Best Science Podcasts
2026.04.14

Genetic Science Could Extend Human Lifespans
2026.04.14

Simplifying Science: ANRF's SARAL AI Initiative
Devdiscourse · 2026.04.14

Spot solid science and avoid fake claims
CBC · 2026.04.14

President of Chulalongkorn University in Thailand visits Science Tokyo | Science Tokyo
2026.04.14